List of Potential Public History Venues

In this course, your final group presentation is a crucial part of your grade (20%). I am interested in how well you can design and execute a historical narrative via a mock museum exhibit. I will also grade you on your ability to work collaboratively. The assignment is designed to encourage you to explore avenues of historical research beyond the traditional monograph. I have provided a list of potential sites for you to visit below, but these are by no means the only places you may choose. Since we are blessed with a plethora of venues here in Southern California, you have a wide variety of places to act as your point of entry (see http://www.museumspot.com/cities/losangeles.htm for list of other potential sites). Please feel free to discuss your choice with me beforehand.

Whittier Museum

http://www.whittiermuseum.org/

Homestead Museum

http://www.homesteadmuseum.org/

El Pueblo (downtown)

http://www.lasangelitas.org/

Whittier Historic Neighborhood Association

http://www.whittierhistoric.org/history.html

Pio Pico Casa

http://www.piopico.org/

Other historic sites in Whittier

http://www.goby.com/historic-sites--near--whittier-ca

Paper Grading Rubric

Paper Grading Rubric

Writing is an art and sometimes difficult to grade. At the same time, writing is also a craft. This is particularly true in the field of history, where the distinction between "good" and "bad" history can be reasonably assessed. In this course, I use a grading rubric for your writing assignments. See chart below.

-------------------

Paper Grading Rubric:

Dimensions:	Grading Criteria: Excellent Paper A/A-	Grading Criteria: Good B+/B/B-	Grading Criteria: Fair C+/C/C-	Grading Criteria: Poor D+/D-/F
Thesis	Clear; stated up front; thoughtful; strong topic paragraph or sentence	Slightly unclear; no strong introduction	Unclear thesis and introduction	No thesis or introduction
Structure	Strong transitions between ideas; clear references to argument; clear arc (beginning/ middle/end)	Generally clear, but weak transitions; vague references to thesis	Somewhat coherent but weak transitions; vague or no reference to thesis	Lack of structure or coherence
Analysis	Demonstrates an understanding of the readings; connects evidence with argument	Reference to but not a clear understanding of readings; vague connection between evidence and argument	Very weak understanding of readings; little connection between evidence and argument	Unable to demonstrate analysis or understanding of sources
Evidence	Clearly highlighted; multiple examples; use of variable sources	Ambiguous use of sources; one-dimensional use	Unclear and/or little use of sources	Little or no use of evidence
Mechanics	No typos, fragments, or run-on sentences; no awkward constructions; no misuse of citations	Minor typos and grammatical errors; run-on sentences	Frequent typos, grammatical, and punctuation errors; frequent run-on sentences	Poorly written with frequent errors